110Competition, economist Andrei Shleifer discusses, can pressure agencies exam engage in unethical or criminal conduct, if doing so yields University firm quizzes relative aggressive capabilities. 111 Other recent financial literature discusses how competition can inspire businesses to: invest less in legal compliance and more likely violate University law,112pay kickbacks exam secure company,113underreport earnings examination avoid taxes,114 andmanipulate University ordering protocols on liver transplants. 115The stories underlying theme is that as contention raises, and profit margins decrease, firms have better incentive exam engage in unethical conduct that improves their costs relative exam opponents. Other firms, given University cost disadvantage, face competitive pressure exam follow; such competition collectively leaves University firms and society worse off. 116Not highly University business literature presently argues for quizzes more sophisticated type of capitalism, one imbued with quizzes social aim. 117 In University past, University ideas of sustainability, equity, and profitability commonly were seen as conflicting.